A LIVING HISTORY BLOG.

18TH CENTURY LIVING HISTORY IN AUSTRALIA.

Saturday, 12 January 2013

French Clothing in the New World. Part Two.


o    The Louisbourg Institute of / L' Institut de Louisbourg de Cape Breton University ~ © 1995-present ~ Louisbourg.info@pc.gc.ca 
  A Research Site for the Fortress of Louisbourg National Historic Site of Canada operated by the Louisbourg Institute ~
  Un site de recherche du lieu historique national du Canada de la Forteresse-de-Louisbourg géré par l'Institut de Louisbourg
Report/Rapport © Parks Canada / Parcs Canada --- Report Assembly/Rapport de l'assemblée © Krause
 House Info-Research Solutions
o    CIVIL COSTUME AT LOUISBOURG: 1713 - 1758
MEN'S COSTUME
o    BY
o    MONIQUE LA GRENADE
o    March 1972
o    (Fortress of Louisbourg Report H-F16AE)
o    Translated By Christopher Moore
o    I. CLOTHING
o    A. SHIRTWEAR
o    1. THE SHIRT
o    Whether of rough cloth for the fisherman or fine cloth for the great merchant broker, the shirt was an indispensable item of clothing. During the day, men wore shirts against their skin, with a vest and breeches. The night shirt or Amadis shirt (chemise en Amadis) was made of "light cloth with more narrow sleeves". [1] The term "amadis" was not used at Louisbourg, but Governor Duquesnel, for example, owned sixteen "nightshirts" (chemises de nuit) at about 10 livres each. [2]
o    However the word "shirt" alone was most often used, since night shirts and shirts worn during the day were probably very similar. The shirt usually reached to knee-height. It was open at each side, and split at the front from collar to chest. The sleeves "reached beyond the hands; but were attached at the end of the arm by buttoned cuffs". To this basic style could be added trimming "of finer cloth, plain or embroidered, or of lace; the trimmings at the cuffs are called manchettes ... that at the front is called  jabot ..."[3]
o    The making of a shirt [4] began with the preparation of sleeves. To start, one folded a rectangle of cloth along its length and then sewed the two sides, leaving an opening of two pouces at one end to insert the armpit gusset and an opening of three pouces at the other end. Each side of this opening, called the fourchette of the cuff, was hemmed. Next the sleeve of the shirt was folded to the size of the cuff, to which it could then be sewed. The cuff is a narrow strip of fabric, doubled over. Its size could be adjusted to the wrist size of the wearer. Each side of the cuff had a button-hole. The body of the shirt was a long piece two aunes (approximately 94 inches) or a little less in length, folded over unevenly to make the front slightly shorter than the back. A six pouce cut was made in the front of the fabric for the opening of the jabot (a frill or ruffle of lace at the throat). The end of this cut was reinforced by a heart-shaped gusset called the coeur du jabot. At the neckline, the cloth was cut on the fold, to the right and left of the hole for the 'a.1 bat, to six inches from the shoulder. At each side, the upper third was left open to receive the sleeve; the middle third was sewn and reinforced by a gusset at the bottom; and the bottom third was left open.
o    The collar piece was a band of toile adjusted in length to the size of the wearers neck. Its width varied according to taste. It was folded along its length and the doubled band sewn at the neck of the shirt closed with two or three buttons.
o    Then the sleeves were attached. They were sewn to the body of the shirt, with flat folds on the upper side of the shoulder.
o    Accounts of inventories or public sales at Louisbourg are brimming with references to shirts. Often they tell nothing but the number of shirts, or add only the most vague details such as "common", "trimmed", "old", "used", "of poor quality". In general, then, men wore shirts as simple as those described above, made of toile. (See Table No. 1)
o    # For this and other un-translated terms in the text, see the glossary.
o   

o    TABLE NO. 1: SHIRT FABRICS
PERIOD
TOILE
COTTON
UNSPECIFIED
1713 to 1745
80
4
521
1748 to 1758
105
4
513
1713 to 1758
185
8
1,034
o    DOCUMENTATION:
o    1713-1745: 49 documents referring to shirts 605 times
o    1748-1758: 48 documents referring to shirts 622 times
o    1713-1758: 97 documents referring to shirts 1,227 times
o   

o    Throughout the history of Louisbourg, this fashion was unchanged. One finds a certain stability in comparing documents predating and post-
dating the English occupation of 1745-1748.
o    However the quality or type of toile could vary, as could the trimmings added to the shirt, and there are few exceptions to normal colours, styles and fabrics.
o    A few examples of price will show that a variety of qualities existed. In 1743 six used shirts which had belonged to a fisherman (compagnon pêcheur) were valued at 13 sols 4 derniers each.[5] In the following year, the effects of Governor Duquesnel included eighty-one trimmed shirts ranging in value from 4 to 14 livres.[6]
o    The amount of wear on these articles partially explains the divergence in price; but the quality of the toile must also be considered. (See Table No. 2) Shirts of toile d'Alaçon for example, were a luxury available only to the wealthy. Even simple white toile implies a concern for quality since the frequent washings required must have represented a great deal of work.[7] Hence it was rare for common people to wear those shirts, unless they had found some way to enrich themselves. In one case, a soldier drew attention to himself by wearing shirts of good quality stolen from a merchant. Questioned about it, a witness answered that he had not "suspected that the shirts had been stolen because the said Paquet usually wore the best, having earned a let of money the previous year..."[8]
o    Rough unbleached toile (la grosse toile écrue) was the most common type. It served in the making of the shirts sold by the merchants and probably also those classed simply as "common". This was cloth without
o   

o    TABLE N0. 2: TYPES OF TOILE USED IN SHIRTMAKING
YEAR
QUANTITY
PRICE
CLOTH
OCCUPATION
1732
1736
1741
1750
1750
1751
1752
1756
1757
1757
1757
47
3
7
4
13
4
1
24
6
2
1
-
3#3s
1#4s
5#
6#
-
1#15s
-
-
-
-
"rough unbleached toile"
"white toilet"
"rough toile"
"blue Zinga toile"
"Bretagne toile"
"Rouen toile"
"royal blue toile"
"toile de Leval"
"Jinga"
holland toile
Rouen toile
"bourgeois"
-
-
schooner
captain
treasurer of the Marine
stolen from a merchant bourgeois
-
merchant
-
-
o    DOCUMENTATION:
o    From the documents referring to shirt fabrics (See Table 1), we have isolated those which specify the type of toile. We have listed the average price for each group
o    and the occupation of the people involved when these details were available.
o   

o    its fibers bleached: it was left in its original state, which was gray in the case of flax and yellowed if made of hemp.[9]
o    Apart from these two colours and white, coloured shirts were very rare. In all the consulted documents, there are only four shirts of striped cotton; [10] one of "blue Zainga toile"; [11] one of striped blue toile; [12] three of "blue checked cotton" and three other "blue";[13] one of "striped toile" and one of blue gingham.[14]
o    Except for the coloured cottons noted above and one other of "cottonade", [15] toile was always the fabric used.
o    Finally, several style specifications can be found. In 1734, the inventory of the goods of a drowned man, likely a fisherman, included "basque" shirts.[16] In four other inventories, all of merchants, can be found twenty-four "sailor's shirts" (chemises de matelot) in 1720;[17] thirty "fisherman's shirts" (chemises pour pêcheurs) in 1738,[18] fifty-eight "Saint Malo shirts" (chemises malouine) in 1743 [19] and twelve "Breton shirts" (chemises bretonnes) in 1756. [19a] Evidently these qualifying terms refer to styles of shirts favoured by seamen, so it is not surprising to find mention of them at Louisbourg, where fishing was an important activity. However, we have no information which would enable us to describe this shirt.

French Clothing in the New World. Part One.



By John Buxton.


“During their travels across Canada, the French [canadiens] dress as the Indians; they do not wear breeches.”
– Peter Kalm 1749
“Those who go to war receive a capot, two cotton shirts, one breechclout, one pair of leggings, on blanket, one pair of souliers de boeuf, a wood-handled knife, a worm and a musket when they do not bring any. The breechclout is a piece of broadcloth draped between the thighs in the Native manner and with the two ends held by a belt. One wears it without breeches to walk more easily in the woods.” - d’Aleyrac, 1755-1760

“The mitasses are some kind of very wide gaiters with the two sides sewn together approximately four fingers from the edge with no buttons or buttonholes. - d’Aleyrac,
1755-1760

“…& about sixty militiamen with a kerchief on their heads and wearing shirts and their backsides bare in the Canadian style.” - Pierre Pouchot , 1755-60
By John Buxton.


“The brahier  is a piece of deerhide or broadcloth that Europeans give them, it is a quarter or third (of an ell) of broadcloth that men pass between their legs as if they were riding a horse; this piece of cloth passes on a thong tied around the hips, the two ends hanging in front and in the back, the front is longer then the back.”
-J.C. Bonin, 1750’s.
French milita By Frances Back.



“What are called mitasses or mitassonnes in Native language are some kind of stockings that Canadiens make with two half-ells of broadcloth, or one ell of molleton cut in two, for each leg and sewn the length of the leg and the width of half the width of the calf so that the leg can get in, with an excess of four or five inches wide that is left free along the side of the leg, the bottom can be put in the shoe and the legging can be held in place with a garter tied above the calf. When one wants to be more fancy, one trims these with straight or wolfe-tooth pattern, along the edge.” -J.C. Bonin, 1750’s.

“To this end, I laid aside my English clothes, and covered myself only with a cloth, passed about the middle;
a shirt, hanging loose; a molleton , or blanket coat; and a large, red, milled worsted cap.” - Alexander Henry,
1761, disguising himself as a Canadien voyaguer.

“It is not uncommon to see a Frenchman with Indian shoes and stockings, without breeches, wearing a strip of woolen cloth to cover what decency requires him to conceal.” – Jonathan Carver in Detroit. 1766

The Man's Work Frock in New France. Part One.

Recently on another forum the use of the common work frock in New France has been questioned. This has mainly come about it seems because these French living historians had not actually ever heard of the work frock being in existance. So I have sort of opened a can of worms!

Okay, I can't at this stage in my research prove that the French work frock was used in New France, but it seems to me that if all other French clothing was taken to New France, why would the man's work frock be an exception? All I can do at this present time is show what I have for the use of the frock in France, but my research goes on.

18th century French peasants by artist George S. Stuart.
When I first saw this exhibit I wondered about the frock having no collar and no cuffs. Obviously the cuffs could have been there originally but are now missing from wear and tear. The collar could be the same, though I have seen a common French undershirt with no collar as in this next image.
© © National Gallery, London / Art Resource; 
As you can see, this common shirt does not appear to have a stand-up collar.
http://pinterest.com/textiletrunk/antique-vintage-french-fabric-and-textiles/; 
This French frock looks very much like the one in the exhibit at the top of this page. No buttoned cuffs, and no stand-up collar.
A French baker. 18th century.
The next eight images of French workers wearing the frock are from Diderot's Encyclopedia.













Making Fire By Mike.

Mike is one of our group members and one of those chaps who does not give up easily on any project. A while back Mike made a video on making fire with flint and steel, and he had some problems. It is fortunate that Mike is very open about his experimental archaeological efforts, win or lose he still shows his results. This can be a specially frustrating when Mike sees me make fire in a very short time and it looks easy. But I must say here, that it is not always that way.
A while back I was making fire with flint,steel and tinderbox and the grass kindling I was using would NOT take fire. It smoked a lot, but I just could not get flames. I changed the grass, and made fire as usual. Some grasses/kindling are just like that. Probably damp, but not damp enough for me to feel it.
Anyway, you will see in this video that Mike did everything right, and should have made fire easily. But it just did not turn out that way. Thank you Mike for letting me share this video. It shows people that sometimes, through no fault of your own, things just don't always work out the way they should.

Collect dry kindling grass whenever you can and if you have a chance to warm it in front of a fire before putting it in your fire bag then do so. Make sure your charred plant tinder does not attract moisture in a cold tinderbox!!! It might pay you to open the tinderbox up after the tinder is smothered (when making it) and warm it in front of the fife before closing again and putting in your fire bag or pocket. I suspect this too may have happened to Mike, because he was creating good sparks with that steel of his but it still took a while to catch any on the tinder. Anyway, watch this video and learn.
Thanks again Mike, very much appreciated.
Keith.