tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093666650139166859.post2496882672150388074..comments2024-03-26T20:00:38.042-07:00Comments on A Woodsrunner's Diary: Blades of the 18th Century Woodsrunner 2.Keithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12562001301604097606noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093666650139166859.post-82335401066493991732011-11-12T17:01:09.129-08:002011-11-12T17:01:09.129-08:00No apologies required Elmo, I welcome your questio...No apologies required Elmo, I welcome your questions. It is questions that keep these forums going.<br />I believe the method of carrying the tomahawk/[trade axe] through the back of the belt was the most common method for woodsrunners, both colonials and woodland Indians. There were apparently tomahawk pouches/covers which were suspended on a strap over the shoulder. There is at least one example of a leather cover being used in the late 18th century. Rogers Rangers also used a frog on the belt as was used for carrying the bayonet. I will see if I can find some images for you. Covering the blade was I think a personal thing, some did, some did not. Much I suspect like everything else depended on personal experience.<br />Regards, Keith.Keithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12562001301604097606noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093666650139166859.post-61849119344834883492011-11-11T05:13:51.571-08:002011-11-11T05:13:51.571-08:00The point is it can be dangerous to carry any blad...<i> The point is it can be dangerous to carry any blade with no cover.</i> <br /><br />Of course, of course. I see some modern, ah, "creative" reenactors (like Renaissance fair performers, for example) carrying dull prop hatchets thrust through the belt with uncovered blades, and it looks extremely unsafe. I can't imagine a person living in the wilderness taking such a risk of serious injury. <br /><br />For a while, I've been very curious about how people carried tomahawks--if they were used as weapons as well as woodworking and butchering tools--so as to keep them both safe and handy for a "fast draw", for want of a better term. <br /><br />Was it standard practice to carry a tomahawk thrust through the belt with a separate cover over the blade? Am I inappropriately projecting modern obsession with fast access onto a group of people who just didn't think it was that big a deal? <br /><br />Sorry to belabor the point, but you're the only person I know who's put so much work into knowing how real people solved these problems.elmo iscariothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14710846725911318970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093666650139166859.post-27964415839443337712011-11-10T23:03:52.276-08:002011-11-10T23:03:52.276-08:00If I am hunting wild boar, I take the wrap off bef...If I am hunting wild boar, I take the wrap off before I start. The point is it can be dangerous to carry any blade with no cover. There is a period record of a hunter slipping on ice. He put his hand out to brake his fall, and landed with his weight on top of his tomahawk which cut his hand off. It is a matter of safety first & using common sense I guess. In a real situation where you feel you are in danger from attack, then you take the wrap/guard off the blade.<br />Keith.Keithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12562001301604097606noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093666650139166859.post-36693931472512598482011-11-10T09:38:27.452-08:002011-11-10T09:38:27.452-08:00Wouldn't carrying a tomahawk with the blade wr...Wouldn't carrying a tomahawk with the blade wrapped in linen make it difficult to use as a weapon? I imagine you'd need quite a bit of warning to start unwinding all that cloth.elmo iscariothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14710846725911318970noreply@blogger.com